The Biocentrism is an environmental ethical philosophy that accords moral standing to all living things, as opposed to anthropocentrism, which accords human's higher status than any other living thing.

Biocentrism is an approach to life that advocates respect for all living beings, which dates back centuries but became a formalized theory only during the 20th century. Fighting deforestation could be seen as biocentric because it preserves non-human life, but this viewpoint also has its critics.

Controversial is the belief that all living beings possess intrinsic worth. Critics claim this viewpoint relies heavily on subjective judgment and isn't scientifically sound.

Biocentrism presents several problems. First, it fails to explain how living things acquire intrinsic value; secondly, it does not take into account differences between human interests and non-human interests - for instance, it would be foolish to assume a bacterium has the same desire to stay alive as humans since that would result in unequal treatment of living beings.

Moreover, Biocentrism fails to acknowledge that human beings are the most intelligent species on Earth, capable of making complex decisions and changing them for the better. Therefore, it would be unfair for all other living things to be placed below humans in terms of importance.

Does biocentrism really deserve our consideration? Here are a few key issues with it. First of all, biocentrism relies on subjective experience for its basis.

1. It Is Not a Scientific Theory

Biocentrism is a philosophy that considers all living organisms (including humans) on equal terms, rather than assigning any values and moral standing solely to humanity. While non-human animals have long been given value by anthropocentrism, Albert Schweitzer popularized modern biocentrism within Western academics by advocating an increase in animal values that help humans live in harmony with nature - an essential aspect of environmental ethics.

This perspective rests on the belief that the universe was designed from its inception to support life and consciousness, drawing from controversial principles of quantum physics such as wave-particle duality and observer effect - concepts yet to be proven through experimentation, and many scientists remain dubious of their relevance; conversely, conscious cosmos theory remains an intangible concept despite being widely debated within science circles.

Though lacking scientific support, biocentrism is an increasingly popular alternative to anthropocentrism. This holistic viewpoint holds all species equally valuable and can be used to support animal liberation and environmentalism initiatives. However, it should be noted that biocentrism does not correspond with eugenics (the genetic selection of certain traits).

Biocentrism has also been criticized for being too human-centric. Reducing the importance of non-human animals may seem like a positive move, but it could actually backfire and have adverse consequences for humans - leading some to become nihilistic and self-absorbed, or even turn away from religious belief altogether.

The final criticism of biocentrism lies in its use of misleading and misapplied scientific theories, such as multiverse theory or many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, to support philosophical claims or support biocentrism as evidence. Furthermore, these concepts do not correspond with other scientific theories nor provide insight into why or how the universe functions.

2. It Is Based on Subjective Experience

Biocentrism rests upon the belief that all living beings should be treated equally and with care and consideration, rejecting anthropocentrism which places humans as moral agents at the forefront. Proponents include Holmes Rolston III, Paul Taylor, and Aldo Leopold who promote it based on the notion that all species form part of an interdependent web of life, each contributing something unique to its ecosystem.

Biocentrism is founded on the assumption that all living things possess intrinsic worth; this includes animals, plants, and microorganisms alike. Biocentrism differs from zoo centrism which only considers animal value; humanism only considers humanism; biocentrism also believes all living beings should be protected from harm and advocates a shift in how humans view and treat nature.

One of the major limitations of biocentrism is that it does not provide empirical evidence of its claims and makes assumptions that are not supported by scientific research, such as asserting that consciousness is the cornerstone of reality and all living things have the same consciousness - an assumption not supported by evidence, as scientists still cannot provide conclusive proof for its existence.

Robert Lanza, an advocate for biocentrism, asserts that death is an illusion based on multiverse theory and the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. However, such claims misappropriate science as there is no scientific evidence suggesting we will awaken in another universe upon dying - it's more likely we will simply die and pass from this one for good.

Biocentrism stands in contrast to many scientific theories which are grounded in objective observation and experiment. Instead, its claims about consciousness as an inherent property of the universe and its primacy over biological life do not hold water under current knowledge of physics and cosmology; furthermore, biocentrism fails to produce testable predictions, therefore invalidating itself as an acceptable scientific theory.

Biocentrism's most contentious component is its belief that life and consciousness are crucial to understanding reality, which makes it hard to reconcile with modern physics which does not require conscious awareness to exist, while at odds with many well-established philosophical theories such as subjectivism and materialism.

The physics of the cosmos explains its complex behavior without recourse to biological life or awareness. Theories like relativity and quantum mechanics, for instance, can account for aspects like light speed, gravitational fields, and subatomic particle behavior.

Furthermore, biocentrism's belief that time can slow or stop completely contradicts other physicalist observations. Time dilation occurs due to drugs like LSD that alter perceptions of reality; additionally, moments may seem to last months or years! All these observations lead to one conclusion - biocentrism's theory must be flawed!

3. It Is Too Demanding an Ethics

Biocentrism is an ethical point of view that advocates the intrinsic worth of all life, including humans. This stands in stark contrast to anthropocentrism which puts humans above other living things. Biocentrism's philosophy rests on a belief that consciousness underlies reality, contributing to the cosmos through living organisms. 

Additionally, humans should live harmoniously within nature by altering their lifestyles accordingly, treating animals with kindness and care, and living harmoniously as part of nature itself.

While the idea of giving all living things moral value dates back centuries, modern biocentrism was first popularized in academic circles during the 20th century in Western academic environments. Influenced by Buddhism's ahimsa teachings as well as Native American cultures' reverence for life values. 

The practical implications of biocentric ethics can be summarized into four basic duties: non-maleficence, noninterference, fidelity, and restitutive justice. Unfortunately, however, these obligations don't always meet the demands of strict biocentric ethics - for instance when survival needs conflict with interests such as food or entertainment consumption - ethical killing may still be permissible in self-defense situations while hunting them is unethical behavior.

Biocentrism has been heavily criticized for lacking scientific credibility and being too demanding as an ethics code. Many physicists contend that biocentrism is nothing more than mysticism that misrepresents quantum mechanics findings, while its reliance on consciousness as the cornerstone of reality lacks scientific proof: scientists are still attempting to ascertain exactly how consciousness influences physical reality around us.

Biocentrism does not fit well with ecological ethics, which emphasizes human-nature interactions. Furthermore, it's unclear how biocentric ethics would address issues like eliminating invasive species for ecosystem health or providing compensation to harmed individuals.

4. It Is Based on A Misunderstanding of Science

Biocentrism is a philosophy founded upon the idea that all forms of life possess intrinsic value and should be given moral standing, including humans. This idea has its origins in naturalism and science; while its modern manifestation began with Albert Schweitzer's reverence for life theory. Since then, it has become mainstream academic philosophy.

Biocentrism does have some drawbacks. It puts too much emphasis on consciousness as the basis for reality, neglecting non-conscious beings or events, and neglecting non-human intelligences or events that occur outside our conscious experience. Scientists are still trying to grasp what consciousness entails; to give it such a central place is contentious and speculative. 

Furthermore, numerous scientific studies exist which challenge this claim that awareness shapes reality - for instance, Nicolas Gisin has demonstrated light can exist both as both particle and wave simultaneously while Anton Zeilinger has explored entangled quantum systems billions of times larger than our planet Earth!

These studies demonstrate that the physical world exists without consciousness and that the laws of nature operate independently from our thoughts. Their findings support biocentrism as an ideology founded upon an improper interpretation of science.

Biocentrism disregards the significance of human beings. It's essential to keep in mind that humans are special beings with unique abilities that can help solve environmental issues and promote social progress; biocentrism's rejection of anthropocentrism could compromise efforts to protect the environment while furthering social justice efforts.

5. It Is Based on Anthropocentrism

Biocentrism refers to the belief that humans are at the core of moral value; first proposed by Albert Schweitzer and based on "reverence for life." Although not a new idea, biocentrism has grown increasingly popular due to environmentalist movements. Similar in some respects to anthropocentrism but with key distinctions of its own. This paper will compare and contrast them as well as discuss any ethical considerations they raise.

Biocentrism should be understood as a philosophical rather than scientific theory. It relies heavily on subjective experience and emotional appeals rather than hard evidence. Influences include New Age ideas and mystified interpretations of quantum mechanics as well as borrowing from the concept that living beings created the universe.

Though biocentrism may seem noble in principle, its arguments often lack sufficient substance for rigorous scrutiny. Biocentrism's main criticism lies in its insensitivity towards behavior that only benefits humans while dismissing our natural tendency for self-love as part of nature.

Biocentrism is founded upon a misapprehension of cosmology; it holds that all theories of the universe rely on biological life for an explanation when in reality most of it comprises dark matter and dark energy that do not require living organisms to exist. Biocentrism also assumes that its origin lies within consciousness when scientists have yet to explain any such phenomenon as an answer to its existence.

Biocentric arguments overlook the fact that the world is not flat and other organisms have equal rights to survive on the earth, as well as humans' choices that benefit the entire environment as a whole. For example, biocentric environmentalists would advocate that companies that pollute rivers invest fifty million dollars into an effective pollution control system which would benefit both animals and humans alike; but an alternative could be offering payment of one million dollars as compensation in exchange for being permitted to continue polluting that river. 

6. It Is Based on A Misunderstanding of Human Nature

Biocentrism refers to an approach to ethics that broadens moral consideration to encompass all living beings as candidates for moral consideration. While the idea may sound appealing, its practical ramifications may be far-reaching and cause trees to be considered worthy of preservation because they're living beings with intrinsic value, even though cutting them down would harm other species and ecosystems - biocentrism creates an artificial hierarchy among species and ecosystems which does not exist in reality.

Biocentrism's other major weakness lies in its reliance on an inadequate understanding of human nature to support its claims. Biocentric philosophers frequently employ quantum physics concepts as evidence that consciousness influences the universe; however, these ideas can be complicated and require careful consideration when used to support philosophical arguments.

Note that quantum physics remains mostly theory. We still do not have definitive proof of many of its ideas and their existence - there's still much we do not understand about the nature of our universe!

Biocentricists commonly invoke wave-particle duality to support their belief that conscious observation influences physical events around us; however, this theory has never been supported by scientific research or proof.

Furthermore, the concept that consciousness is an essential part of existence goes well beyond science into philosophy. Scientists still are grappling with understanding what consciousness entails and whether or not it plays such an essential part in creating our universe.

Note that biocentrism is a form of holism, an ideology that asserts all living creatures have equal value. While its principles tend to be well-intentioned, sometimes their principles may lead to misguided policies; for instance, some may think species or ecosystem wellbeing should come before individual wellbeing; this can lead to irreparable harm being done to both people and animals alike.

7. It Is Based on A Misunderstanding of Physics

Biocentrism is the theory that all living things possess intrinsic value regardless of whether they provide any direct benefit to humans, providing an alternative viewpoint to anthropocentrism which treats humans as more important than all other living things. 

Unfortunately, however, biocentrism suffers from several scientific deficiencies; for instance, it assumes all living beings have beneficial goals - an unfounded assumption that fails to take into account human interests differ from animal interests and the interests of other living beings.

Biocentrism's second flaw lies in its misinterpretation of physics. For instance, biocentrism asserts that space and time are merely animal sense perception - an astounding claim given their physical nature as studied by scientists; furthermore, it contradicts both relativity theory and quantum mechanics which have been rigorously verified over centuries.

Biocentrism also fails to appreciate the nature of consciousness, asserting that consciousness is at the core of reality. This viewpoint echoes an old philosophical concept called idealism which contends that our minds create reality; this view has since been disproved by most scientists and philosophers.

Biocentrism is founded upon a misperception of death and suggests that, upon dying, people reincarnate into another form of life. However, this idea lacks any scientific support: for instance, its many-worlds interpretation does not support reincarnation after death and recent brain research indicates no such practice exists.

Biocentrism is an incomplete worldview that falls short of scientific ethics standards. It employs a misperception about consciousness to justify its claims, while overlooking any impact humans may be having on nature and biodiversity preservation. Environmental ethics and deep ecology offer more realistic approaches to conserving biodiversity.

8. It Is Based on A Misunderstanding of The Universe

Biocentrism challenges the foundational dogmas of physical science by proposing that life is an indispensable component of reality and that consciousness creates reality. Biocentrism also asserts that the laws of the universe have been specifically tailored to sustain life; however, such claims based on an incomplete understanding of the universe's composition cannot be scientifically justified.

Scientific thought has dismissed this idea because it is too anthropocentric. The universe is vast and contains billions of galaxies, stars, planets, and other physical objects that don't rely on life to exist; furthermore, laws of physics such as conservation of mass can explain its behavior without recourse to humans as an explanation.

Biocentrism misunderstands the nature of life. It proposes that all living things possess intrinsic value and that this value determines their moral standing, but this view fails to consider their survival needs, which may conflict with this idea of intrinsic worth. Furthermore, it fails to account for some beings being more crucial than others - for instance, if deer are essential food sources in an ecosystem it may be necessary to kill one to stay alive.

Biocentrism fails to take into account that some living beings possess higher moral values than others, creating ethical dilemmas such as whether humans should consume other animals for food. Moreover, it fails to acknowledge their unique places within nature resulting in environmental issues.

9. It Is Based on A Misunderstanding of The Nature of Consciousness

The biocentric worldview is founded on the assumption that life is essential to existence and asserts that its existence was designed by nature itself. Unfortunately, this theory lacks empirical support; instead, it relies heavily on misconceptions of science that mislead people into believing its truth. Instead, biocentrism represents spiritual ideas presented using scientific language.

Biocentrism's core concepts can be quite contentious, such as its belief that consciousness is an essential element of reality. Many scientists have taken issue with this notion due to a lack of empirical proof and also for its tendency to use physics and cosmology as bases for philosophical speculation.

Controversially, the idea that everything in the universe is connected through consciousness can also be controversial. This goes against traditional views on matter which assume separate objects exist independently from one another; but in contrast, the biocentric view holds that everything is connected through consciousness as one big ecosystem.

Biocentric worldview is often criticized for positing that the universe is "tuned" specifically for life forms. This view assumes consciousness operates independently of physical matter, suggesting that living beings may play a dominant role in influencing its outcomes compared to other causes, such as gravitational forces of mass and energy. Unfortunately, such assumptions cannot account for all possible explanations for its development such as mass/energy imbalance.

Biocentrism is a moral philosophy that expands the definition of moral consideration to include all living beings, regardless of whether they are humans. Biocentric ethics are founded on the idea that all beings possess intrinsic value regardless of species classification. This idea mirrors Gaia's theory which sees Earth functioning like an orchestrated ecosystem providing conditions necessary for life to exist on our planet; furthermore, species egalitarianism underlies biocentrism which holds that all species have equal worth.

10. It Is Contradictory to Scientific Theories

Biocentrism is an inflammatory theory that holds that all living creatures should be seen as vitally important. According to this view, all forms of life are connected, thus underscoring our need to protect the environment and preserve biodiversity. All living things possess intrinsic worth that should not be hurt in any way. Biocentric beliefs are not founded in science; instead, they rely heavily on subjective experiences and philosophical speculation; furthermore, they conflict with scientific theories such as relativity and quantum mechanics.

Respecting all forms of life is always desirable, yet biocentrism goes too far by asserting that humans are the central figure in the universe. While this might appear appealing at first, this dangerous philosophy lacks any basis in reality and disregards non-human animals and nature's impact upon it - all while making unreasonable demands on humans and insisting happiness is our ultimate goal.

This theory rests on the belief that conscious observation and awareness play an integral part in creating reality, drawing on quantum physics principles such as wave-particle duality and observer effect to do so. Unfortunately, many scientists disagree with this viewpoint; they contend that quantum physics does not provide enough clarity for drawing such grand conclusions.

Contradicting other scientific theories such as evolutionary psychology experiments and other evolutionary theories, it does not address how and why humans came into being or why we are unique individuals. Therefore, one must examine all evidence available before reaching any definitive decision regarding this theory's validity.

Biocentrism has been popularized by individuals such as Deepak Chopra and Robert Lanza, both prominent scientists. Yet their books and lectures don't hold up under scrutiny: their claims essentially restate idealism (an ancient philosophy that holds that mind creates all reality) which was popular in several ancient Eastern and Western philosophical schools - yet its validity cannot be demonstrated scientifically.

The bottom line, biocentrism is nothing more than mysticism and should be disregarded accordingly. People like Robert Lanza are using science to advance their personal spiritual views at the expense of scientific progress and this practice should be disapproved of as it does no service to science itself.